GOP lawmakers want Mulvaney sidelined in budget talks

Senate Republicans, eager to avert a government shutdown or automatic spending cuts, want acting White House chief of staff Mick MulvaneyJohn (Mick) Michael MulvaneyCongressional leaders, White House officials fail to reach budget deal Congressional leaders, White House officials to meet Wednesday on spending The Hill’s 12:30 Report — Presented by MAPRx — Supreme Court double jeopardy ruling could impact Manafort MORE pushed to the sidelines in budget negotiations with Democrats.

GOP lawmakers would prefer Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven Terner MnuchinThe Hill’s Morning Report — US strikes approved against Iran pulled back Pelosi: Trump delay on Harriet Tubman is ‘an insult to the hopes of millions’ Schumer requests investigation into Trump admin decision to delay bill featuring Harriet Tubman MORE take the lead in representing the White House, as they see him being more amenable to a two-year spending deal that would also raise the debt limit.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mulvaney, on the other hand, is viewed as resistant to striking a two-year deal, which would take the prospect of another government shutdown off the table until after the 2020 election.

And Republicans point to Mulvaney’s time in the House as the reason for their concern.

As a founding member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, Mulvaney was an outspoken critic of big budget deals that swell the federal deficit. That’s also one of the main reasons President TrumpDonald John TrumpThe global economy is a soap opera, expect some plot twists Huawei sues US government over seized equipment Trump defends planned ICE deportations MORE appointed him to serve as White House budget director before he transitioned last year to serve as acting chief of staff.

GOP lawmakers say they were pleased that Mnuchin took the lead in a recent meeting Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiTrump: ‘I think I win the election easier’ if Democrats launch impeachment proceedings Hillicon Valley: House panel advances election security bill | GOP senator targets YouTube with bill on child exploitation | Hicks told Congress Trump camp felt ‘relief’ after release of Clinton docs | Commerce blacklists five Chinese tech groups Washington is mum as Nancy Pelosi threatens to hold debt limit hostage MORE (D-Calif.) hosted in her office with Congress’s other top leaders.

“He’s been very helpful. My experience with Secretary Mnuchin has been very positive, and I think it’s a job he’d be good at,” Sen. John CornynJohn CornynThe Hill’s Morning Report — US strikes approved against Iran pulled back Sanders says Juneteenth should be a national holiday GOP frets about Trump’s poll numbers MORE (R-Texas), an adviser to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTrump urged to quickly fill Pentagon post amid Iran tensions Nikki Haley blasts Roy Moore’s Senate bid: ‘He does not represent our Republican Party’ Hillicon Valley: House panel advances election security bill | GOP senator targets YouTube with bill on child exploitation | Hicks told Congress Trump camp felt ‘relief’ after release of Clinton docs | Commerce blacklists five Chinese tech groups MORE (R-Ky.), said of Mnuchin taking the lead for the White House in budget talks.

Cornyn said he understood from speaking to Sen. Patrick LeahyPatrick Joseph LeahyHillicon Valley: House panel advances election security bill | GOP senator targets YouTube with bill on child exploitation | Hicks told Congress Trump camp felt ‘relief’ after release of Clinton docs | Commerce blacklists five Chinese tech groups Senate Democrats press regulators over reported tech investigations House Democrats close to finalizing border aid bill MORE (Vt.), the ranking Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee who is involved in the talks, that Mnuchin will be taking a more central role and praised it as a positive development.

ADVERTISEMENT

Another Republican lawmaker close to the talks said Mnuchin is “now playing the lead role” and expressed satisfaction with that development.

“He brings the stature of the Cabinet,” the GOP senator said.

Republicans think Mnuchin will be more amenable to striking a deal with Democrats because he is eager to raise the debt limit in a timely and orderly way. A budget agreement would be a convenient vehicle to raise the debt limit, as it would likely pass both the Senate and House by wide margins.

Reaching a spending deal soon would also send a reassuring signal to financial markets.

“He’s been in the private sector. He understands it’s important to talk about the debt limit because he understands sending a message to bond markets around the world,” the GOP senator added.

Democrats publicly, and Republicans privately, have identified Mulvaney as an obstacle to getting a deal.

Mulvaney and Mnuchin have been on the same page in meetings with congressional leaders, but lawmakers suspect Mulvaney is more of an obstacle than Mnuchin, largely because of his past affiliation with the House Freedom Caucus.

“I think Mulvaney does not want a deal, and I think that’s the biggest problem. Mr. Mulvaney believes his negotiating authority or positioning will be better if there’s no deal,” said House Majority Leader Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerMcConnell opposes push for lawmaker pay raise Clyburn apologizes after criticism of ‘tokenism’ by top Democratic leaders Progressives seize on impeachment in 2020 primaries MORE (D-Md.), who said he’s been briefed by Pelosi on the negotiations.

“One of the problems, of course, is the Republicans can’t get agreement among themselves, between the Republican senators and the White House, and that’s unfortunate,” added Hoyer.

Senate Republicans fear they will lose leverage the longer the talks remain stalled.

“At some point, somebody has to put the hammer down on Mulvaney. You’re not going to get anything you want unless Nancy gets everything she wants on the domestic side, moneywise, at least. I don’t know why they can’t figure that out,” a GOP lawmaker said of the difficulty the White House has had dealing with Pelosi.

“They think the president’s hand gets stronger over time. Most of us think it gets weaker over time,” the Republican lawmaker said, warning that letting the impasse drag out later in the year risks the chance of a government shutdown in December.

“Why would the president want to start the election year like that?” the senator asked, predicting that Republicans would get most of the blame for another government shutdown.

A senior administration official said, “It does no good for Republicans to negotiate with ourselves.”

The senior administration official said Democrats are to blame for the lack of progress and downplayed the likelihood of another shutdown or the scarier prospect of the federal government not being able to pay its obligations by failing to raise the debt ceiling.

“Democrats ended negotiations this week because they continue to push their dead-on-arrival $2 trillion increase with unserious policy riders, while the administration has made serious compromise offers,” the official said. “A shutdown or debt default is not going to happen.”

McConnell hosted a meeting with Mulvaney, Mnuchin and senior members of the Senate Appropriations Committee last week in an effort to convince the White House that a two-year spending deal is the best option.

Mulvaney has frustrated GOP and Democratic lawmakers alike by pushing for a one-year deal instead of the two-year deal that McConnell and most Senate Republicans favor.

“I think Mulvaney wants a one-year deal,” Sen. Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbyMcConnell vows to ‘vigorously’ oppose Moore’s Senate bid Roy Moore says he will run for Senate in Alabama The Hill’s Morning Report – Democrats frustrated by Hope Hicks’s silence MORE (R-Ala.) said before the meeting.

Sen. Lamar AlexanderAndrew (Lamar) Lamar AlexanderOvernight Health Care: Trump officials defend changes to family planning program | Senators unveil bipartisan package on health costs | Democrats pass T spending bill with HHS funds Chris Murphy may oppose bipartisan health bill unless it addresses ObamaCare ‘sabotage’ Key senators release bipartisan package to lower health care costs MORE (R-Tenn.) said the talks have dragged on for long enough.

“I just think it’s time for the president and the Republican leaders to sit down and work this out. We need to get on with it,” he said.

Republicans were frustrated this week when Mnuchin and Mulvaney proposed a fallback option of passing a one-year continuing resolution (CR) that would essentially freeze spending at fiscal 2019 levels.

“I hate that idea,” said Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamTrump urged to quickly fill Pentagon post amid Iran tensions Trump says he intends to nominate Esper to lead Pentagon Overnight Defense: Latest on Iran after Trump halts planed strike | Dems call Trump’s approach ‘erratic’ | Key Republican urges Trump to retaliate | Esper reportedly getting Defense secretary nomination MORE (R-S.C.), who has otherwise defended Mulvaney as doing a good job, when asked about the idea of a yearlong CR.

Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsOvernight Defense: Officials brief Congress after Iran shoots down drone | Lawmakers fear ‘grave situation’ | Trump warns Iran | Senate votes to block Saudi arms sales | Bombshell confession at Navy SEAL’s murder trial The 7 GOP senators who voted to block all or part of Trump’s Saudi arms sale Senate votes to block Trump’s Saudi arms sale MORE (R-Maine) said, “A one-year CR is a very bad idea.”

“CRs lock in spending from the previous year and do not take into account priorities or changed circumstances,” she said.

Sen. Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiOvernight Defense: Officials brief Congress after Iran shoots down drone | Lawmakers fear ‘grave situation’ | Trump warns Iran | Senate votes to block Saudi arms sales | Bombshell confession at Navy SEAL’s murder trial The 7 GOP senators who voted to block all or part of Trump’s Saudi arms sale Senate votes to block Trump’s Saudi arms sale MORE (R-Alaska) said, “You know how I feel about CRs. I’m not a fan.”

Another Republican member of the Senate Appropriations Committee called a one-year stopgap “a terrible idea.”

While Mnuchin was the one who proposed a one-year stopgap measure as a plan B, lawmakers saw Mulvaney, who still serves as the White House budget director in addition to his role as acting chief of staff, as the main impetus behind it.

Russell Vought, Mulvaney’s former deputy who now serves as acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, suggested in late April during a meeting with senior congressional staff that Congress should consider a long-term CR if it couldn’t reach a deal on raising the spending caps.

Click Here: highlanders rugby gear world

Leave A Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *